The Mencius once had told us: “ all believes a book to be inferior to having a book. ” this word although the source goes a Mencius, it is cruel to the war ignorance, but the truth that told us a profundity however: Want to have critically sex thinking.
孟子曾经告诉过我们：“尽信书则不如无书。”这句话虽源出孟子，是对战争残忍的无知，但却告诉了我们一个深刻的道理：要有批判性思维。
Common people evaluates " history write down " : “ investigate day person during, connect Gu Jinzhi to change, into character. Why is ” character? Indeed, minister change is a great historian, but his " history write down " also not be completely objective, for example, he is very apparent the ground unplugs tall Li An, debased Wei Qing and Huo Qu disease: He thinks, with respect to ability character, li An is completely OK comparative with Wei Qing and Huo Qu disease, however, in fact Li An's tactics does not suit Han Chao to Hun large-scale fight: Of his praise highly ride shooting is a kind of method that emphasizes equestrian skill overly, and the development pattern that the concussion of Wei Qing and praise highly of place of Huo Qu disease cavalry just fits cavalry and the national condition of Chinese face, it is hasten of general trends place. River the battle on the west, the battle of desert north proved a such facts: Using 3. Before the Han Jun cavalry of 4 meters of Bo Ziji and pike, the Hun horse that has 2 meters short lance and sabre only can by press close to cruel dozen. Arms of “ husband Chinese with one Chinese when 5 introduced from the northern and western nationalities or from abroad ” , “ bright make strong Chinese person, although far put to death surely these ” historical facts confirm of all without exception is worn this. Regrettablly, the description with minister endless and objective change caused the error that people understands later ages, think for a long time “ but make Long Chengfei will be in, do not teach introduced from the northern and western nationalities or from abroad Ma Du ” of the Yinshan Mountains.出自 wwW.zuoWEnBA.nEt
世人评价《史记》：“究天人之际，通古今之变，成一家之言。”为什么是一家之言呢？诚然，司马迁是一位伟大的史学家，但是他的《史记》也并不是完全客观的，例如，他非常明显地拔高了李广，贬低了卫青与霍去病：他认为，就能力而言，李广完全可以与卫青与霍去病相当，然而，事实上李广的战术并不适合汉朝对匈奴的大规模作战：他推崇的骑射是一种过分强调骑术的方法，而卫青与霍去病所推崇的冲击型骑兵才适合骑兵的发展规律与汉朝的国情，是历史的大势所趋。河西之战，漠北之战都证明了这样一个事实：在使用3。4米卜字戟与长矛的汉军骑兵面前，只有2米短矛与马刀的匈奴骑兵只能被贴近暴打。“夫汉兵以一汉当五胡”，“明犯强汉者，虽远必诛”这些史实都无不印证着这一点。只可惜，司马迁不尽客观的描述造成了后世人们理解的偏差，长期以为“但使龙城飞将在，不教胡马渡阴山”。
What is if is inquire generation the most authoritative,enginery book? " defense preparation annals " front row of inevitable ascend body. However, " defense preparation annals " apple-pie? Otherwise. " defense preparation annals · full marks / appliance piece " in once mentioned “ (cease month knife) with holding show hero, solid the position that cannot use. ” at first sight, fall on his back it seems that lunar knife is a kind of flags that cannot be used at actual combat implement, actually otherwise, " defense preparation summary " in mention “ husband bolo (fall on his back namely lunar knife) battle of benefit Yu Ma, it is the ability the home, be not the speech of ” of Bu Shizhi ability. " summary preparing the sea " in mention “ today an old name for Japan child husband of alone of very fierce …… closes the knife Wang San 16 knives, this is a knife kind the word of the first ” . " Ji Xiaoxin book " in it is to mention halberd of tomahawk of “ husband bolo, axe, picture, billhook more, this comes in and go out alone therefore the ability in 10 thousand army clumps also, cannot teach an arms, cannot formidable the speech that greets archenemy ” . Just about " defense preparation annals " in not realistically description, caused later ages the understanding deviation of people.
如果问明代最有权威的兵器书是什么？《武备志》必然跻身前列。然而，《武备志》就完美无缺了吗？不然。《武备志·满分/器械篇》中曾经提到“（偃月刀）以操之示雄，实不可施之阵地。”乍一看，似乎偃月刀是一种不能用于实战的仪仗器，其实不然，《武备要略》中提到“夫大刀（即偃月刀）利于马战，乃将家之技，非步士之技”的话语。《筹海要略》中则提到“今倭子刀甚凶……惟夫关王三十六刀，此乃刀类第一”的话。《纪效新书》中更是提到“夫大刀、斧钺、画戟、钩镰，此乃独出入万军丛中技也，不可教阵兵，不可堂堂迎大敌”的话语。正是《武备志》中不写实的描述，造成了后世人们的理解偏差。
Of Qi Jiguang " Ji Xiaoxin book " can saying is Chinese ancient time divide " training solid period " outside have definitive a book on the art of war most, however even if be in " Ji Xiaoxin book " in, also have such description: One an old name for Japan of “ is extremely irruptive chirp booth, my army group of gun jab, like that thief of an old name for Japan one knife, criterion I ten guns all are folded also. ” if the distance between every two guns is 0. 5 meters word, 11 guns are 5 meters probably, what use according to Japanese pirates place is wild too if a meter of Dao Changlai of 6 calculates the knife, he needs one knife to turn circuit just can achieve …… of this kind of effect at many o'clock besides, bright end returns the person that have big gun of “ red garment, a few lis in use up all the account of erosion ” : One artillery piece goes down, circumference ten lis desert, look I am big bright had come true two play one bit ……
戚继光的《纪效新书》可以说是中国古代除《练兵实纪》外最具有权威性的兵书了，然而即使是在《纪效新书》中，也有这样的描述：“一倭贼突入哨亭，我军群枪戳之，然倭贼一刀，则我十数枪尽折也。”如果每两只枪之间的距离是0。5米的话，11支枪大概是5米，按照倭寇所使用的野太刀一米六的刀长来计算的话，他需要一刀转一圈多一点才能达到这种效果……除此之外，明末还有“红衣大炮者，几十里之内尽皆糜烂”的记载：一炮下去，方圆十几里寸草不生，看来我大明已经实现两弹一星了……
The book is not suspect, just cannot fanatic, want to have the thinking of critically sex, otherwise, can offer as a gift only person laughingstock stopped.
书不是不可信，只是不可盲信，要有批判性的思维，不然，只能遗人笑柄罢了。(文/王政凯)